#175 Lessons from Peter Thiel
What I learned from reading “Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future” by Peter Thiel.
Today’s Chapter is based on the book “Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future” by Peter Thiel.
Peter Thiel is a billionaire entrepreneur, and venture capitalist. He co-founded PayPal in 1998, serving as its CEO until eBay acquired it for $1.5 billion in 2002, and later became Facebook’s first outside investor with a $500,000 stake in 2004.
Here’s what I learned:
Zero to One
“If you want something new, you have to stop doing something old”
— Peter Drucker
Peter Thiel believes there’s two types of progress that shapes how we should approach innovation and business strategy: horizontal or vertical progress. He coins the terms “1 to n” to describe horizontal or extensive progress meaning copying things that work and “zero to one” to describe vertical or intensive progress meaning doing new things. Thiel argues that the latter is what truly advances civilization and creates outsized value.
He writes, “Of course, it’s easier to copy a model than to make something new. Doing what we already know how to do takes the world from 1 to n, adding more of something familiar. But every time we create something new, we go from 0 to 1. The act of creation is singular, as is the moment of creation, and the result is something fresh and strange.”
This idea reflects the reality that in today’s world, globalization and technology has made copying easier than ever. Hence, it is a lot easier for companies to go from 1 to n by expanding into new markets by replicating successful models. However, this also leads to commoditization and limited returns. Therefore, only true technology breakthroughs create entirely new progress. He reiterates that “When we think about the future, we hope for a future of progress. That progress can take one of two forms. Horizontal or extensive progress means copying things that work—going from 1 to n. Horizontal progress is easy to imagine because we already know what it looks like. Vertical or intensive progress means doing new things—going from 0 to 1. Vertical progress is harder to imagine because it requires doing something nobody else has ever done.”
“The single word for vertical, 0 to 1 progress is technology.”
— Peter Thiel
Furthermore, Peter Thiel believes that startup companies are the ones that mainly thrive on original thinking due to their small size. He argues that because these companies are lean, it is much easier for them to innovate. In contrast, larger corporations have a more difficult to innovate since they are sitting on their past successes and have much more difficulty changing things.
As a matter of fact, it is far less risky for them to improve an existing product rather than to invent an entirely new category. He writes, “All companies must be “lean,” which is code for “unplanned.” You should not know what your business will do; planning is arrogant and inflexible. Instead you should try things out, “iterate,” and treat entrepreneurship as agnostic experimentation.”
“Indeed, the single most powerful pattern I have noticed is that successful people find value in unexpected places, and they do this by thinking about business from first principles instead of formulas.”
— Peter Thiel
This reminds me of Andy Grove at Intel who was known for his unrelenting focus on staying ahead of the competition and anticipating the next big shift in the technology landscape. At the heart of Grove’s philosophy is the idea that healthy paranoia is an essential quality for business success. As he once said, “I believe in the value of paranoia. Business success contains the seeds of its own destruction.” This notion may sound extreme, but Grove’s logic is hard to refute. In fast-moving, hyper competitive markets, complacency is the main reason for the downfall for even the largest companies.
This risk comes from the fact that when companies are doing well, the leadership teams can become complacent as they fail to recognize the warning signs that the industry is slowly changing beneath their feet. Grove saw this dynamic play out time and again, as once-dominant players in the tech sector found their fortunes suddenly in free fall.
Grove illustrates this point by recounting the experiences of his own company, Intel, as it navigated a strategic inflection point in the computer industry, where there are often changes to the rules of the game. He observes that “sometimes these rules change—often in very significant ways. Yet there is no flashing sign that heralds these rule changes. They creep up on you as they crept up on us, without warning.”
His solution was to encourage a guardian attitude among his management team, where vigilance against potential threats was the default mindset.
“I believe that the prime responsibility of a manager is to guard constantly against other people’s attacks and to inculcate this guardian attitude in the people under his or her management.”
— Andy Grove
This is especially true considering middle management are often the first to sense the shifting winds of change. He explains that “middle managers—especially those who deal with the outside world, like people in sales—are often the first to realize that what worked before doesn’t quite work anymore; that the rules are changing.” Heeding the insights of these frontline employees can be instrumental in anticipating and adapting to the new realities of the market.
The lesson here is that business leaders cannot afford to be passive observers, waiting for the next crisis to emerge. Instead, they must be actively scanning the horizon, stress-testing their assumptions, and empowering their teams to voice concerns without fear of repercussion.
Uncover Secrets
“If conventional thinking makes your mission impossible, then unconventional thinking is necessary.”
— Elon Musk
Peter Thiel believes that innovation comes from uncovering secrets. However, he observes that most people have convinced themselves that all the important discoveries have already been made. They assume that anything truly valuable must already be known and that the only remaining opportunities lie in marginal improvements. In Thiel’s opinion, this mentality is a mistake. He writes, “The actual truth is that there are many more secrets left to find, but they will yield only to relentless searchers. There is more to do in science, medicine, engineering, and in technology of all kinds. We are within reach not just of marginal goals set at the competitive edge of today’s conventional disciplines, but of ambitions so great that even the boldest minds of the Scientific Revolution hesitated to announce them directly.”
In fact, Thiel believes that most people stop looking for secrets because they are afraid of being wrong, or because they have the internal idea that if something was truly possible, someone would already be doing it. As such, great companies are built on secrets that are hidden in plain sight. Thiel lists out examples from Silicon Valley such as Airbnb and Uber.
“Great companies can be built on open but unsuspected secrets about how the world works. Consider the Silicon Valley startups that have harnessed the spare capacity that is all around us but often ignored. Before Airbnb, travelers had little choice but to pay high prices for a hotel room, and property owners couldn’t easily and reliably rent out their unoccupied space. Airbnb saw untapped supply and unaddressed demand where others saw nothing at all.”
— Peter Thiel
Peter Thiel mentions that there are two kind of secrets: secrets of nature and secrets about people. Thiel explains, “There are two kinds of secrets: secrets of nature and secrets about people. Natural secrets exist all around us; to find them, one must study some undiscovered aspect of the physical world. Secrets about people are different: they are things that people don’t know about themselves or things they hide because they don’t want others to know. So when thinking about what kind of company to build, there are two distinct questions to ask: What secrets is nature not telling you? What secrets are people not telling you?”
As such, Thiel encourages founders to actively look where nobody else is looking. Ignore conventional wisdom and the herd mentality. The most important is for founders to think for themselves, as that is the only reliable way to uncover a secret that can become the foundation of a great company. He writes, “Recall the business version of our contrarian question: what valuable company is nobody building? Every correct answer is necessarily a secret: something important and unknown, something hard to do but doable. If there are many secrets left in the world, there are probably many world-changing companies yet to be started.”
This reminds me of Chung Ju-Yung (founder of Hyundai)’s favourite question of “Did you Try?”. In fact, when Hyundai first got into the car industry, they knew that they had to partner with an American company who had superior technology. When Chung heard of Ford’s visit in South Korea, he immediately asked his younger brother to negotiate an automobile assembly technology contract with Ford. His brother was taken back as it seemed improbable to reach an agreement this quickly with a major foreign car company. Chung responded with the following saying: “Have you even tried?”
For Chung, the first rule to become a successful person is to have the mentality of thinking that anything is possible. As he explains, “If you doubt yourself, then you will only be able to accomplish as much as your doubts let you. If you think you can’t do something, then you won’t be able to do it.”
As a matter of fact, Chung Ju-Yung mentions the importance for a company to innovate, especially when there are competitors. In fact, he believes that running a company without competition will slow you down, because if there is no competition, “you don’t need to improve the quality of your product, and there’s also no pressure to shorten production times.” In business, being complacent is the same as falling behind and if you are not leading, you’re losing. By consequence, it is essential for one to think unconventionally to succeed in business.
“I am someone who believes that if a person limits themselves to the fixed ideas inherent in common sense, they will not be very creative.”
— Chung Ju-Yung
In the case of Chung, he knew that for him to beat his competitors, he had to finish projects in a shorter amount of time than other people. In fact, he mentions that he succeeded because while others were still hesitating, he had already begun working. This is the reason why his motto is “shorten the time”. In his opinion, that is the surest way to encourage innovation and improvement. As a matter of fact, he would often take tours of his projects and would always seek to find ways to shorten construction times in unconventional ways.
“When we worked on the Jubail project, we had to make 160,000 drill bits to build the breakwater and shore protection structures. If we built 200 every day, it would take us 800 days to make 160,000. But at the site, the workers were making them one at a time instead of using a mold to mass produce them. Their sorry excuse for this wasteful effort was that the molds weren’t the right height to fix onto the end of the cement trucks.
When I saw this, I was furious. Why did these people have brains if they weren’t going to use them? It didn’t take a genius to realize that the outflow ramp for the concrete on the trucks needed to be raised to fit the molds. If they just followed this simple solution, they wouldn’t need a crane, and they wouldn’t waste time and energy. They couldn’t think to adjust the concrete mixer truck, thinking it was unchangeable. Would the gods punish them for making some small adjustments? After I made the changes, we went from 200 per day to 350 per day.”
— Chung Ju-Yung
Chung believed that finding clever solutions would never come from people with conventional thinking. As a matter of fact, he mentions that “if you only think in accordance with what you learned through books, your imagination will be limited to that.”
80/20
“80% of the results come from 20% of the effort. The key is knowing which 20%.”
— Richard Koch
Peter Thiel is also a big believer of the power law especially in terms of venture capital investing. In fact, while most people intuitively believe in normal distributions: a few terrible outcomes, a few excellent outcomes, and a larger cluster of average outcomes, Thiel argues that this is completely wrong when it comes to startups investing. He mentions that the power law rules everything, meaning that a tiny number of outcomes will produce almost all of the value.
Thiel writes about the Pareto principle by mentioning that “In 1906, economist Vilfredo Pareto discovered what became the “Pareto principle,” or the 80‑20 rule, when he noticed that 20% of the people owned 80% of the land in Italy—a phenomenon that he found just as natural as the fact that 20% of the peapods in his garden produced 80% of the peas. This extraordinarily stark pattern, in which a small few radically outstrip all rivals, surrounds us everywhere in the natural and social world.”
In terms of venture capitalist investing, the Pareto principle explains that more often than not a single successful investment will return more than the entire rest of the fund combined. This is the biggest secret in venture capital according to Thiel. As such, rather than investing in many names, he recommends only investing in five to seven companies, each of which has the potential to become a multibillion-dollar business.
“The biggest secret in venture capital is that the best investment in a successful fund equals or outperforms the entire rest of the fund combined.”
— Peter Thiel
Similarly, the Pareto principle and the power law is also valuable in terms of entrepreneurship. Thiel advises against spraying effort across many projects or pursuing a diversified portfolio of ideas. Instead, identify the single most promising opportunity and pursue it with singular focus.
Furthermore, Thiel believes that many people in Silicon Valley are too eager to start their own startups when they would be far better off joining a fast-growing company. He explains, “People who understand the power law will hesitate more than others when it comes to founding a new venture: they know how tremendously successful they could become by joining the very best company while it’s growing fast. The power law means that differences between companies will dwarf the differences in roles inside companies. You could have 100% of the equity if you fully fund your own venture, but if it fails you’ll have 100% of nothing. Owning just 0.01% of Google, by contrast, is incredibly valuable (more than $35 million as of this writing).”
This reminds me of the Pareto Principle we have learned from Tom Monaghan, the founder of Domino’s who believed in the two following core business tenets:
Prepare pizzas with the freshest ingredients possible
Deliver pizzas to the customers within thirty minutes
To make sure to run a profitable business while still satisfying its promises to the customers, Tom Monaghan used the Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 rule. This principle explains that 80% of outcomes are the result of 20% of inputs. In Domino’s case, Monaghan quickly realized that even though he sold three different sizes of pizzas 80% of his sales came from 12-inches pizzas. Similarly, 90% of beverage sold were either Coke or Pepsi. He explains “In Ypsilanti, at least 80 percent of the orders from dorms were for twelve-inch pizzas. So why have any other size?“
This was a major revelation and breakthrough in Domino’s Pizza history. By doing so, the company was able to leverage its profits even further. It may seems counter intuitive that simplifying a business may increase its revenue, but here’s how Monaghan explains it:
“The main argument for having only twelve-inch pizzas was faster service. But quality would be improved, too. A pizza maker has to learn how to make each size pie. The twelve-incher is easier and larger ones are much harder.
There would be fewer mistakes too both in taking orders and boxing them. With three sizes of pies and just two inches difference between them, it sometimes happened during a rush that a worker would ruin a large pie by trying to jam it into a medium size box.
Then there were the saving we would make in purchasing. Having one size would cut our box inventory requirements by two-thirds.”
— Tom Monaghan
Beyond the Book
Read "Summary: Peter Thiel’s Zero To One" by Farnam Street
Watch "Zero to One by Peter Thiel | Why Competition is for Losers (TIP786)" on YouTube
Read "Leverage: Gaining Disproportionate Strength" by Farnam Street
Listen to "#424 Peter Thiel on How to Build a Creative Monopoly" by Founders Podcast
If you are interested in having conversations with the eminent dead, consider trying my AI Chatbox prompted with highlights from over 100+ biographies I have read. Try it here.
If you enjoy reading my newsletter, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. You’ll be able to keep this newsletter going! Here’s what you get when you upgrade:
Voting on polls: you’ll get to vote on who I should write about next.
Requesting biographies: you can request a biography for me to read and write about next.
Supporting my next book purchase: all payments received will be used to purchase a new biography.